Meanwhile, Clearview’s CEO Hoan Ton-That has issued yet another nonsensical non-defense of Clearview’s business model that basically says Clearview will continue its non-compliance with CNIL’s earlier order. Whether or not France will be able to collect remains to be seen. Finally, as noted in its statement, Clearview made things worse for itself by blowing off CNIL last year, when it informed Clearview of its initial conclusions and ordered it to delete data belonging to French citizens. The repackaging for resale violated GDPR restrictions on processing of collected data. According to the CNIL’s findings, Clearview’s scraping/repackaging program violated privacy rights of citizens by not obtaining consent to collect the data. That’s the statement from France’s privacy regulator. On the basis of the information brought to its attention, the restricted committee decided to impose a maximum financial penalty of 20 million euros, according to article 83 of the GDPR. “The chair of the CNIL therefore decided to refer the matter to the restricted committee, which is in charge for issuing sanctions. However, it did not provide any response to this formal notice,” the CNIL wrote in a press release today announcing the sanction. “Clearview AI had two months to comply with the injunctions formulated in the formal notice and to justify them to the CNIL. As Natasha Lomas reports for TechCrunch, French regulators have hit Clearview with the maximum possible fine for GDPR violations. The same conclusion has been reached in France, adding to Clearview’s European tab. The Italian government had the same problems with Clearview and its web scraping, ordering it to pay a $21 million fine for GDPR violations. The UK, after first threatening a $23 million fine for privacy law violations, finally settled on a $9.4 million fine that came with an order to delete all data pertaining to UK residents. But outside of the US, Clearview is finding it almost impossible to engage in shady business as usual.Ī few countries have explicitly uninvited Clearview. Thanks to a lack of strong privacy laws, not much can be done about Clearview’s scrape-and-sell tactics. Since all of this data is compiled without anyone’s permission (including the sites being scraped), Clearview has been fined, sued, hit with cease-and-desists, and found itself reviled even in the surveillance tech industry.Ĭlearview’s run in the US has been slightly more successful that its endeavors outside our borders. Scraping the web of any relevant content to compile a few billion records for facial recognition matches is no way to run a respectable business, and Clearview has been anything but respectable.Įarly access was granted to anyone who was interested, including private companies, government agencies, and whatever billionaires might be willing to throw a few dollars Clearview’s way. Clearview hasn’t won many friends since its inception.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |